It’s All About the Customer – Failure is Death

by

Post image for It’s All About the Customer – Failure is Death

 

I invite you to join me as I con­tinue my… well let’s call it a voy­age of dis­cov­ery. Pub­licly, it all started last week with a post enti­tled “It’s All About the Cus­tomer; 5 Myths to Bust to Get There”, the premise is that busi­nesses have/are mov­ing away from sell­ing a prod­uct to sell­ing a solu­tion by focus­ing on cus­tomer rela­tion­ships and reten­tion. This is how I closed the post:

Myth­buster Needed
What’s we as busi­ness lead­ers need to embrace is new answers for old prob­lems — lead­er­ship, inno­va­tion and growth – and new chal­lenges. In order to do this here are five myths that we need to bust.
 
Myth 1: We can’t Afford to Fail… Often
Myth 2: Deci­sions should be based on data not intuition
Myth 3: Past ways need to be totally forgotten
Myth 4: Prob­lem solv­ing and crit­i­cal think­ing are the same
Myth 5: It’s all about the features
 
I’ll explore these myths more next week.
 
On Field Audible
We most cer­tainly will dig into each of these myths, how­ever, upon fur­ther reflec­tion dur­ing the week I think it is well worth the effort to take the time to explore the back-story that’s dri­ving this trend. After all, if we don’t develop a hypoth­e­sis around the engine of change (the core) how could we ever expect to for­mu­late rea­son­able argu­ments against the myths?

The Post Reces­sion Consumer
I’m not nec­es­sar­ily a fan of trickle-down– eco­nom­ics but rip­ple effects (reper­cus­sions) within the supplier-consumer eco sys­tem are all too real. At the core of the cur­rent busi­ness model renais­sance is the impact the past reces­sion (although to mil­lions it is still all too cur­rent, so well just think of it as the reces­sion and post reces­sion wave) has had on the atti­tudes of con­sumers. In the U.S. we have seen sav­ings rates jump from under 5% of take home pay to in some cases to +10%, ter­ri­tory, an area that has not been treaded upon since the early 1970’s. Accord­ing a Strat­egy + Busi­ness arti­cle “The Power of the Post-Recession Con­sumer” by John Gerzema and Michael D’Antonio, it is a move to a lifestyle more focused on com­mu­nity, con­nec­tion, qual­ity, and cre­ativ­ity. These spend­ing shifts have and will con­tinue to send mas­sive dis­rup­tive waves through the prod­uct deliv­ery process. If for no other rea­son but that those indi­vid­u­als who directly under­take busi­ness pur­chas­ing have had their per­sonal fil­ters read­justed. A human char­ac­ter­is­tic that eas­ily bleeds between per­sonal and busi­ness behaviors.

Not all is lost, as well all know, thanks to Clay­ton Chris­tensen [The Innovator’s Dilemma], dis­rup­tions cre­ate oppor­tu­ni­ties for those that are able to best adjust to the new real­ity. Gerzema and D’Antonio have dis­tilled these con­sumer find­ings into four defin­ing principles:
United by Change; trend has no demo­graphic, geo­graphic, or social bounds.
The New Thrift; a desire to do more on their own
Trans­parency Breeds Trust; true, authen­tic story are the win the day
Com­pa­nies That Care; the abil­ity to iden­tify with cus­tomers is now a must

 Fail­ure is Death, a Slip We’re Cool With
It is almost uni­ver­sally accepted that dis­rup­tion changes the value propo­si­tion in the mar­ket. In the case we are study­ing a revised cus­tomer per­spec­tive on the mea­sure­ment of value and the great, eas­ier access to data that has dri­ven the trend towards mass cus­tomiza­tion of expe­ri­ences, even for the most core prod­ucts and ser­vices. This in turn has forced a pseudo part­ner­ship between sup­plier and cus­tomer, trans­form­ing the com­mu­ni­ca­tions between par­ties into more of an iter­a­tive dia­logue, which has opened a win­dow – although be it nar­row — into the supplier’s inner workings.

At one point in the not so dis­tant past sup­pli­ers believed that they held all the knowl­edge about what was best for their clients. Locked off behind their gated walls the company’s senior man­age­ment and strate­gists mapped out the wid­get and the inter­nal resources required to pro­duce the end prod­uct in the most eco­nom­i­cal man­ner. This was allowed because of infor­ma­tion arbi­trage. The pro­duc­ers knew more about the issue their prod­uct solved than cus­tomers did, and they used that infor­ma­tion advan­tage to cre­ate prof­its. One of the eas­i­est ways to boost prof­itabil­ity was to gain pro­duc­tion effi­ciency by serv­ing up a homoge­nous out­put – one size fits most.

Today, how­ever, there is to a large extent no infor­ma­tion arbi­trage. Every­one has equal access to data. The cus­tomer now holds the largest lever, money, and they are look­ing to spend it with those who pro­vide solu­tions that work with their inter­nal processes and allow them to pro­duce the best res­o­lu­tions within the mar­ket ecosystem.

As a result the R&D process incor­po­rates the knowl­edge of sev­eral inde­pen­dent enti­ties; they are truly tied at the hip. False starts and fits are expected, but if one fal­ters it neg­a­tively impacts the oth­ers. Slip too often and the band will be look­ing for a new member.

This is why the busi­ness devel­op­ment role has taken on a new level of importance. No longer is it just about attract­ing new cus­tomers or enter­ing new mar­kets. The envi­ron­ment dic­tates a philo­soph­i­cal shift toward focus­ing on devel­op­ing strategic-channel rela­tion­ships. Busi­ness Devel­op­ment types must under­stand everyone’s needs, pulling together the cor­rect course of action, and mus­ter­ing the required assets and inter­nal polit­i­cal sup­port all in a trans­par­ent manner.

In short the empha­sis is now on learn­ing (lis­ten­ing & absorb­ing) and dis­cov­ery (prob­ing) before execution.
 
 You can observe a lot by just watching.
- Yogi Berra
 
Related Posts:

Previous post:

Next post: